Toast wrote:
Obitual Crow wrote:
.for the record, I didn't even stop to look at the troll's wall text because I already know it's garbage with tremendous bias plus I will need to break a leg to understand what his engrish says xD
sooo ignorant. after you said that, you're no worse than what you're against.
you're saying he doesn't know his stuff when you refuse to even read anything he wrote. silly goose
miKuru wrote:
Toast wrote:
lol what is the point of making the losing bracket go against the winning bracket? yeah it gives the losing bracket a bit more hope, but it was already made clear who people prefer
Hmmm... Well at first I was going for a single elimination bracket but some of the guys wanted it to be a double elimination so I did it. Personally I wanted a double elimination also so that there will be more fight for third and second place and maybe even first and also double elimination would give us more variety of matchups between the characters.
It's funny how nice you are to my complaint, but then to Clock you're all STFU
most of you all need to learn to use your brains
Toast why would I go all STFU on you? There is no reason for me to be mad at you whatsoever or anyone else. Error on the other hand I don't know if you noticed but he has been trolling this competition since the start of this competition[look from the start and you will understand]. I was being really nice to him since the start but his trolling has obviously been too much. I really don't like to get into fights with people but I'm still human enough to get angry.
Rio wrote:
Wow, such a heated argument over something that's supposed to be fun. Chill out everyone.
This is the first time this is being run so there are bound to be some things that need to be ironed out. We'll save the fixes for the next contest (i.e. judging criteria suggestions, bio length, etc) but for now, the contest is as it is so just let it run it's course. There's always a next time.
On a personal level, I appreciate everyone who's spent time on this contest whether it's organizing, entering, voting... or being a vocal naysayer. I'm looking forward to the next contest and hey, I think I may just enter it.

I'm sorry this argument started.... Due to my inexperienced and also the over excessive trolling of error is what started all this crap.I'll do my best the next contest and try to fix the issues we are having now.
Error 404 wrote:
You say this competition is about creativity, in that case which are the standars for that? You know why competitions are always analised by the technique, proportions, composition and style? because is something you can measure while creativity is something you can't (not measurable at 100%, but at least closer than creativity). I could make a generic draw that everyone could fine "uncreative" at first look, but making a creative stand with it.
I agree that some creativity in a draw should be measured, but it shouldn't be the main focus, because it can't be measure as the others.
Also this is stupid, of course someone who is better is going to defeat someone who is not, thats the whole point of a contest (and at least is a contest where the one who is better win, and not the one with more popularity).
I haven't been voting, because this competition should be finished a long time ago and is obvious who are the first, second and third place. Now if you tell me that my argument of which one are the winners is bad, then Mikulo (yeah, mikulo, I don't spell it wrong because I didn't want it, I enjoy to write your user name like that) which are the standars for voting? because creativity is kinda weak, and obviously technique, composition, style and others are not for the competition.
Also I hate the loser eliminations, as Toast said by msn "Man, it's kinda rubbing in the face of losers how bad they are compared to the winners". You know, when someone tells you which are the first, second and third place, and not telling you how good or bad you went under the winners, it make you hope not being the bottom. Yeah, when you do this, it make someone not only lose, but also someone is going to be in the bottom.
Also ObitualC:
Yeah is a OC competition, where the most appealing win, but the technique, the "how it look", the colour technique and the style are important, because the visual characteristic is the first one someone see and is the one that let people make a first judgment.
Also are you saying that just writting the likes and dislikes of a character is a bio? I don't know, but for my a Bio is something a little more deeper, like problems, story, psychologic behavior, goals, contextualization (yeah, it can be a wizard and you need to make a contextualization throught the story and goals), perspective of life, phylosophy of life, etc.
So even if this is not about skills but about the "Bio's", the Bio's by it's self are failing.
I'm sorry, but the contest is retarded and just because the arguments are bad, the system is bad and people is trying to stretch it to much, something that shows a lack of professionalism (and this is supossed to be a big contest on MT).
Error I think you didn't read my last post properly or maybe you didn't even bother to look at all but you still don't seem to get it.... I may as well list it done for you then if thats the case,,,,,,,,,,
1) About the bio part [example: Age/Likes/Dislikes/
added bio if you want]. I wonder if you even read the last part cuz I already answerd your question...... You just twisted your words and made a new argument happen. Also if you retrace back to the previous post I did state that you may add characters background, behaviour etcetc.
You wrote:Quote:
Also are you saying that just writting the likes and dislikes of a character is a bio? I don't know, but for my a Bio is something a little more deeper, like problems, story, psychologic behavior, goals, contextualization (yeah, it can be a wizard and you need to make a contextualization throught the story and goals), perspective of life, phylosophy of life, etc.
[Troll act number 1]
2)
Quote:
I haven't been voting, because this competition should be finished a long time ago and is obvious who are the first, second and third place. Now if you tell me that my argument of which one are the winners is bad, then Mikulo (yeah, mikulo, I don't spell it wrong because I didn't want it, I enjoy to write your user name like that) which are the standars for voting? because creativity is kinda weak, and obviously technique, composition, style and others are not for the competition.
Since when did I say technique,composition, style is not needed for this competition?
Quote:
It was mainly about CREATIVITY[skill is also needed but not the winning key alone].
Quote:
CREATIVELY and CUTELY created character[if you have skill added on then that would be a bonus]
Quote:
But at the end of the day it all comes down to you imagination and original concepts and your understanding of what a real moe character should be like. the more original your character, the better. Just keep in mind of the many things I stated down. Hope this answers your questions and gives everyone a better understanding of Moe.
Man you seem to miss understand me or rather you don't read or look at what I post[details on the competition and others] and yes I did say creativity is the main but never did I say no to skill/style/technique etcetc. Let me give you an example of what I mean and what this competition is looking for

[If you look at this photo and say that you can't measure or understand the creativity in this then you are just too stupid]
I wrote EVERYTHING at the starting page of this competition and yet all this info just doesn't get into your head I have no idea why.....Please go back to page one and READ what I posted......... Or maybe we could just call it [Troll act number 2]
Oh and yes its obvious who is number 1 and 2 but not 3. There is still a fighting chance for some of the guys at looser bracket to get there. You look down on people too much thats why you fixed your winner 1,2 and 3. Even though they are at the looser bracket doesn't mean they suck.
3)
Quote:
Also I hate the loser eliminations, as Toast said by msn "Man, it's kinda rubbing in the face of losers how bad they are compared to the winners". You know, when someone tells you which are the first, second and third place, and not telling you how good or bad you went under the winners, it make you hope not being the bottom. Yeah, when you do this, it make someone not only lose, but also someone is going to be in the bottom.
I'm sorry to say but you suck as an artist. If you see your at the bottom is doesn't mean you suck or anything. It means that you need to work harder. You need to improve yourself, do more daily drawings, coloring etcetc. As an artist there is no such thing called shame at being at the bottom or noob. It just means you have to work harder to reach the top. It can also be a motivation or a target for a artist to improve him/herself to reach the top and it also tells you that you have lots more to learn. If you don't think this way that just shows that you are an arrogant artist that looks down on everyone and thinks that you are the best of the best. I'm not saying I'm any better then any of you here. Infact I'm a sucky artist myself and draw like crap but I never think its over and I keep pushing myself to get better day by day.
4)
Quote:
I'm sorry, but the contest is retarded and just because the arguments are bad, the system is bad and people is trying to stretch it to much, something that shows a lack of professionalism (and this is supossed to be a big contest on MT).
You can thank youself for starting the arguments cuz you never read properly but just simply blaber out words. Its true I may have over stretch the voting system and yes its true I lack professionalism cuz I'm not a pro and this is my first time doing this. Problems are sure to happen in this kinda competition when done by a first timer. And the contest is not retarded.You are. I don't know what fun you get trolling this contest and like you said [This is suppossed to be a big contest on MT] and indeed it is but why on earth are you still trolling the contest? Lame. And as for the "Mikulo" part. I maybe asian but I do know other languages. You actually mean "Kulo= culo" you probably won't admit it but I know what you mean.[Another troll act]
5)
Quote:
Also this is stupid, of course someone who is better is going to defeat someone who is not, thats the whole point of a contest (and at least is a contest where the one who is better win, and not the one with more popularity).
Well duh obviously. Since when did I say someone better will loose to someone who is not?
Quote:
Oh look its Crow vs Matt. Crow pawn Matt cuz his pic looks more "PRO" and "skillfully" done then Matt's[No offence Matt/Crow. It was only an example]then you switch pages immediatly and do the same to the rest.
I wrote this to show how most people vote wrongly. You should atleast read the bio, look at the creative parts of the pic[MOE]"important". I did over exaggerated at the "PRO" and "skillfully" part[I'm a silly goose sorry]BUT never did I say someone better will loose to someone who is not. What are you trying to get at troll??
6)
Quote:
I agree that some creativity in a draw should be measured, but it shouldn't be the main focus, because it can't be measure as the others.
Why cant it be measured and be the main focus? Creativity can be measured as the others. Want an example? Go to page 1 and look at the two pictures and tell me which one is more creatively done. If you can't say which one then you sure have got some problems.
Now I had my say and I think this argument has gotten too far. Man error if you don't like it here then I'm very sorry that it doesn't meet your expectations. IF you still want to argue then just LEAVE this competition thread and wait for the next competition to be held. Just stop your trolling. I do agree that there are many flaws in this competition due to my lack of experince and I'm very sorry things didn't turn out the way it supposed to be. I promise to make this competition better the next time this competiton is held.
Obitual Crow wrote:
In anycase, I was wondering myself why the contest holds for so long a time duration per voting round...international saimoe only uses 1 day for voting day but I understand that not many can go online...so I was thinking it should just have a vote count limit as a signal to stop voting duration and not by just alotting a period of time to vote...
I was chatting with GaBo on this sometime ago and he agreed that roughly 15 counts is already a good sign of active voting and a good time to stop voting considering the number of active members who go online within a select period and basically counting the usual active members, that number was already good. I actually expected only about 10 votes considering some members to be not interested in being involved in this.
Well I wanted to use the same voting time as the international saimoe tournaments but I figured I put it a week so all members could have time to vote. I guess I'll change it for the next round cuz it is indeed too long.